Usually and
especially in the English speaking world the concept of pedagogical leadership
is connected with upbringing and teaching young children, but at least in
secondary level of schooling the word pedagogy is replaced with instruction and
in literature scholars are writing about instructional leadership instead of
pedagogical leadership when they mean teacher or student or learning related
tasks of principals. So it is pedagogy if you refer early childhood education,
but it is instruction if you refer educating students. However there is a
fundamental distinction between the two concepts. Whereas instructional
leadership focus on teachers, teaching, and try with proper instructions to
alter students’ behavior, pedagogical leadership emphasizes collaboration in
organization and focuses on students and learning. In other words, pedagogical
leadership is based on dialogue, not monologue and the learners are essential
participants in the discussion. Moreover it covers a wider range of aspects of
the teaching act than instruction.
.
Pedagogical leadership consists strategic
elements which involve a wide set of stakeholders in pedagogical improvement.
In his classical writing on pedagogical leadership, Sergiovanni (1998, p. 37)
states that the inclusion of “visionary leadership” among bureaucratic
functions and “entrepreneurial leadership” views are unsuccessful as strategies
to gain change and better results in schools. Furthermore visionary or
otherwise exceptional leaders are hard to find so “the
hope of transforming schools through the actions of individual leaders is quickly
fading” (Harris, Leithwood, Day, Sammons, & Hopkins 2007). So to build a transformational organization needs cooperation of
teachers. Also according to Sergiovanni pedagogical leadership is an alternative
concept of leadership that aims to develop the human capital of schools, involving
both teachers and learners (Sergiovanni 1998). Compared to instructional
leadership, where the emphasis is on school management and there is an administrative
aspect in charge and the school management is accountable to the provider or to
the upper level of the administration, pedagogical leadership has the emphasis on
building a professional learning community with prior accountability to the
learners.
Although the term pedagogy is still
relatively uncommon in the use of teaching in upper levels, but is currently
being used more frequently in publications and teachers' discourse. According
to MacNeill et al. (2005) there appears to be at least five, inter-related
clusters of meaning of pedagogy in the literature: First there is an
epistemological aspect of pedagogy as
the transmission of knowledge, second the socio-ideological aspect of pedagogy
as a political tool for enculturating students, third a social aspect of
pedagogy as social practice and as a
relationship that produces knowledge, fourth there is the pedagogic act, which
consists the mechanical aspects of how knowledge is transmitted and pedagogy as an inclusive view
of all aspect teaching, but not simply instruction, and fifth there is pedagogy
separated from didactics, the European view of culture and learning as
didactics refer to the subjects to be taught.
Unlike instructional leadership,
pedagogical leadership specifically recognizes the cultural, moral, and
societal aspects of what is learned and why it is learned. Pedagogy
acknowledges aspects of learning that were previously described as the hidden
curriculum. Pedagogy peels back the veneer of teaching methodology to expose
the conscious and unconscious decisions made by school leaders as the
communities’ agents of enculturation. A pedagogical leader emphasizes
distributed decision-making and acknowledges the fact that leader is not the
only person, who has the expertise or facts in the particular organization.
REFERENCES
Harris, A.,
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and
organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337-347.
MacNeill, H,
Cavanagh, R.F. & Silcox, S. (2005). Pedagogic Leadership: Refocusing on Learning
and Teaching. International Electronic
Journal for Leadership in Learning 9 (2).
Sergiovanni,
T. J. (1998). Leadership as pedagogy, capital development and school
effectiveness. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1),
37–46.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti